3 ms·
This is, of course, completely barmy regulation. The most interesting thing will be the decision over what classifies as a porn website. Currently, as a teenage
by fredley 9y ago
This is, of course, completely barmy regulation. The most interesting thing will be the decision over what classifies as a porn website. Currently, as a teenager, you're probably most likely to 'stumble across' (i.e. view unintentionally) pornography on non-porn sites like Reddit or Tumblr. Will the regulations require age verification for these sites? If not it will not even begin to achieve its stated aims.
- Stella434 9y agolm måκlng оvêя $7κ å mоnтн шояκlng påят тlmê. l κêpт нêåяlng отнêя pêоplê тêll mê нош mucн mоnêy тнêy cån måκê оnllnê Sо l DêclDêD то lооκ lnто lт. шêll, lт шåS åll тяuê ånD нåS тотålly cнångêD my llfê. This is what I do, ====https://sites.google.com/site/sandralopz78/ https://sites.google.com/site/sandralopz78/
- raesene6 9y agoAFAIK it's commercial sites only, so you're dead right this legislation has failed before they even try and implement it.
- toyg 9y agoWell, youporn is mostly free - is that considered "commercial"?
- raesene6 9y agoI think the tube sites would be considered commercial 'cause they're run by the commercial porn companies. What won't be covered as far as I'm aware is things like reddit, tumblr etc
- gambiting 9y agoIs reddit commercial? You can pay for reddit gold and of course they make money on ads, although they don't make money on porn directly. How about imgur? They host a staggering amount of porn yet are not a porn website - how could they regulate that? How about erotic fan fiction websites where it's 100% text? How about ones where it's just hentai? It's just an idiotic legislations that most likely has nothing to do with porn - it just wants to establish a framework on which the government can ban anything it doesn't like.