4 ms·
Bridge traffic + BART congestion means that it's easier for me as a resident of San Francisco to visit Palo Alto than Oakland. Maybe not how it should be, but
by scythe 9y ago
Bridge traffic + BART congestion means that it's easier for me as a resident of San Francisco to visit Palo Alto than Oakland.
Maybe not how it should be, but certainly how it is; with a new Bay crossing slated for 2040 at the earliest it'll be like that for a while.
- russell_h 9y agoAt what time of day? Currently Google maps shows a 20 minute drive from SOMA to downtown Oakland vs 40 minutes to PA. If you're trying to use public transit obviously the difference will be even greater.
- scythe 9y agoCommute time, because that's what (work!) we're discussing. I don't know what BART train you guys ride, but my coworkers in the East Bay would often try to leave the office before 4:30 or after 6, or ride the train the wrong way for a few stops, because the tunnel is so crowded at rush hour. The bridge is awful for commutes, of course. And some people apparently think "second Bay crossing" refers exclusively to a road, which is not what I meant
- dasil003 9y agoIf you really are concerned about the crush, just walk back to Powell and you get yourself at worst a nice aisle or wall spot, the mistake is trying to get on at Embarcadero. Also, in general it's nothing compared to the human density London Tube commuters have to face even with 4-5 times the number of trains. Comparing to Palo Alto where you either have to take Caltrain and take what feels like a double digit risk of a multi-hour delay, or else a hour plus drive, compared to the 15 minutes it takes to get from FiDi to downtown Oakland is just ridiculous on its face. I've lived in both Oakland and Palo Alto, and anyone complaining about SF <-> Oakland commute has no sense of Bay Area commute perspective.
- ende 9y agoAC Transit and the SF Ferry are the best ways to cross the bay.
- otterley 9y agoWhat do you mean by BART congestion? I've been commuting for over 5 years during rush hour, and I can count on one hand the number of times I've had to wait for the next train due to overcrowding.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- sulam 9y agoBART is more congested than it used to be, at least at Embarcadero. It's not uncommon to have to wait multiple trains if you want to get on going to Walnut Creek or Dublin/Pleasanton. It's still the most convenient way across the bay, though. The ferries are nice (and reasonably fast) but their schedules have to work for you.
- woah 9y agoMaybe I shouldn't tell you this, but just ride backwards to civic center and you will get a seat.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- andrewem 9y agoSorry to tell you, but the general rule that adding road capacity doesn't reduce congestion (due to induced demand) will be true of any future Bay crossings.
- scythe 9y agoInduced demand only goes so far, y'know. The rule is not that consistent.
- sulam 9y agoSorry, this is totally not true. It's harder to DRIVE to the East Bay than to arbitrary points south (not Palo Alto), but public transit is generally much better to the East Bay. And most of the driving congestion is simply getting onto the bridge, which I admit is non-trivial (especially with Giants day games thrown into the mix), but once you're on the bridge it's markedly better than 101 and roughly the same as 280. 280 is still a prettier drive, though!
- scythe 9y agoIt's easier to drive to Palo Alto than take any form of transport to the East Bay. And I live near Parkmerced, which may skew the numbers.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- SeoxyS 9y agoI mean, you live in possibly the most inconvenient part of the city. It literally can't get more inconvenient and inaccessible than Parkmerced. I lived there for a month and had to move because it was just so dreadful.
- zghst 9y agoIt’s inconvenient but the highway is right there. No car would make it hell
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- rockinghigh 9y agoYou essentially live in Daly City.