Were you unhappy with the fact that no one felt like arguing with your reply to SpaceManiac, so you're trying again? The scenario you presented, client <-> ser

Were you unhappy with the fact that no one felt like arguing with your reply to SpaceManiac, so you're trying again? The scenario you presented, client <-> server, has nothing to do with wisty's original statement, "As I understand it, it means banning end to end communication between clients. So you can chat over https, but only if the server in the middle (which can be served warrants) is doing the encryption." which is client <-> server <-> client, and is completely irrelevant. You are changing the definition to client <-> server. Think about it.