14 ms·
Yes. It's the C replacement I've been waiting for. It's very well and carefully designed. It took me a while to "get" Rust, but I'm now much productive in it t
by pornel 9y ago
Yes. It's the C replacement I've been waiting for. It's very well and carefully designed.
It took me a while to "get" Rust, but I'm now much productive in it than C. Syntax is not pretty, but it's convenient.
Now whenever I program in C I miss being able to declare which pointers are owned/borrowed (and great dependency management, etc., etc.)
The only thing I miss from C is its wide acceptance. I have to justify use of Rust, but not use of autotools :O
- frik 9y agoLike what Elixir is to Erlang, I wish there would be a NEW-LANG to Rust that has a nice syntax like Go or Swift but with the advantages of Rust, based on Rust's foundation (but with an simpler, nicer syntax).