The alternatives proposed aren't any better. If we are to believe that law enforcement has Trojans that can bypass encryption, then we must believe that they ar

The alternatives proposed aren't any better. If we are to believe that law enforcement has Trojans that can bypass encryption, then we must believe that they aren't reporting the security flaws which allow the installation of these Trojans. These security flaws are not limited to law enforcement--terrorists can use them just as effectively as law enforcement can. So what the argument boils down to is: we shouldn't worry about law enforcement undermining security because law enforcement had already fundamentally undermined security? I don't buy it.