3 ms·
Here's an aspect. In Berlin, landlords realized they could get three times as much from an apartment by putting it on AirBnB rather than actually renting it to
by probably_wrong 9y ago
Here's an aspect.
In Berlin, landlords realized they could get three times as much from an apartment by putting it on AirBnB rather than actually renting it to someone. The situation got so bad that it is now illegal to rent an apartment where you don't actually live[1] (with exceptions[2]).
If the situation in Amsterdam is similar to Berlin, this means that every one of those dots[3] is an apartment that locals cannot use. Tourists are, on a way, taking over their city, and those that live there have to reshape their lives to accommodate them. The citizens of Amsterdam, the ones that make it a nice place to visit in the first place, are losing access to their own city.
[1] https://berlin.airbnbcitizen.com/update-from-berlin/ https://berlin.airbnbcitizen.com/update-from-berlin/
[2] https://www.thelocal.de/20160809/court-rules-small-victory-against-berlin-airbnb-ban https://www.thelocal.de/20160809/court-rules-small-victory-a...
[3] Minus the data cleaning issues mentioned somewhere else
- Boothroid 9y agoIn my experience hotels in Amsterdam are expensive and low quality. Perhaps if this weren't the case, there wouldn't be such a market for AirBnB. Moreover, tourists bring huge amounts of money to Amsterdam. Without this the city and its citizens would be considerably poorer.