4 ms·
They gave a massive buyout offer before copying. There was only one thing left to do after that.
by majani 9y ago
They gave a massive buyout offer before copying. There was only one thing left to do after that.
- ouid 9y agoIf you're arguing that Facebook behaved rationally, then we aren't in disagreement. If you're arguing that Facebook acted in the public interest, then you're going to need a different argument.
- srtjstjsj 9y agohow is the public interest harmed by letting facebook users send snaps?
- kuschku 9y agoThe public interest is harmed by Facebook eliminating all competitors.
- kinkrtyavimoodh 9y agoSo you seem to be implying that ONE company having a feature is somehow better for public interest than TWO companies having that feature? Or that it is better for public interest that people prop up companies with multi billion dollar valuations on the basis of trivially copy-able features?
- ouid 9y agoIf that were a complete accounting of the variables then yes, that is what I would be saying. That is not a complete accounting of the variables though. It is harmful to the public interest to allow a company to use its monopoly status as leverage to monopolize other markets. Facebook is competing for image messaging in the same sense that Lance Armstrong was competing in the tour de france. Monopoly is the degenerate case of capitalism, and this kind of behavior by monopolies is how the degeneracy reproduces.
- Nydhal 9y agoWho in their right mind would argue that facebook is acting in the public interest?