4 ms·
In a free nation, demand can only be controlled through restriction on immigration and birth rates. For the USA that means demand is a national policy issue. It
by erentz 9y ago
In a free nation, demand can only be controlled through restriction on immigration and birth rates. For the USA that means demand is a national policy issue. It cannot be managed by cities or states. All cities and states can do is manage supply to meet demand.
But for addressing your concern this is good news: "before people either do or don't come up with a consensus on what society and growth should look like."
Unless there is a dramatic shift in policies to allow MASS immigration or everyone starts breeding like rabbits in the USA, we do not really have a problem here where our urban spaces will develop into unpleasent places. In fact it's actually the underinvestment in our urban spaces that precisely creates many of the issues people connect to cities.
Cities and states need to address the supply and infrastructure problem to allow people to live affordably, with a good standard of living, in the places that they want to live.
- mistermann 9y ago> In a free nation, demand can only be controlled through restriction on immigration and birth rates. For the USA that means demand is a national policy issue. And since that topic is associated with race, good luck having an objective discussion in a Western country. In Canada, if you even suggest there is a discussion worth having, a huge percentage of the population will immediately assume you are a Trump supporting racist. More subtler topics like the obvious fact that some segments of immigrants are not contributing to the economy via income taxes while massively increasing housing demand are completely beyond discussion.
- nardi 9y agoI realize that, historically, immigration has involved race. But I don't see any intrinsic reason that should be so.
- mistermann 9y agoIt doesn't have to, but it does. It's actually a funny "conversation".....race/culture is irrelevant/nonexistent, unless you suggest bringing in middle class immigrants from other Western countries, and then for some reason, it suddenly is important, very important that it is drawn from lower class nations, usually "coincidentally", predominantly visible minority countries....under the guise of "diversity" (even though we were just told that all cultures are the same). This has always been obvious, but I've never really understood "why" people acted like this without resorting to crazy conspiracy theories. This article that someone linked has a very plausible theory: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/01/the_upper_middle_class_is_ruining_all_that_is_great_about_america.html http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/201... "Or take immigration policy: Dean Baker of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research has called for increasing the number of doctors, dentists, and other professionals allowed into the U.S. while limiting the number of less-skilled people, like would-be retail clerks, custodians, and housekeepers. The reason is that high-skilled immigrants squeeze the wages of upper-middle-class professionals, who can afford to take a hit while lowering the cost of various services for poorer people by giving them the option of going to cheaper doctors and dentists. By contrast, bringing in retail clerks, custodians, and housekeepers makes life cheaper for the upper-middle-class professionals while squeezing the wages of working people, particularly immigrants who already live in the U.S. Want to guess how popular the idea of increasing the wages of nannies is with the upper-middle-class people who employ them? I’d love to know, but I’m sorry to report that upper-middle-class pollsters have yet to ask the question." It is a really good article, I encourage everyone to read it.
- wickawic 9y agoIt doesn't have to be about immigration, that's silly. The US currently had supply and demand issues amongst it's growing and declining cities.
- erentz 9y ago> It doesn't have to be about immigration, that's silly. I said "demand can only be controlled through restriction on immigration...". For example, if the Bay Area wants to control demand to keep house prices lower, it has no ability to that because it does not have a border. It cannot stop people moving there. Only the federal government can do that at a national level by controlling how many people can cross the border to immigrate. And as a second matter influence birth rates through public health programs (but birth rates aren't a problem in the USA). > The US currently had supply and demand issues amongst it's growing and declining cities. Yes, but cities and states cannot control demand. They can only control supply.
- wickawic 9y agoFair point, sorry I read your comment uncharitably.