4 ms·
those against "chemicals" in food often demonstrably have no idea what they're talking about. the overloading is a rhetorical attempt to associate fear and lack
by chemicalscare 9y ago
those against "chemicals" in food often demonstrably have no idea what they're talking about. the overloading is a rhetorical attempt to associate fear and lack of knowledge with everyday experience. your defense of this practice is vastly more inane than any objections to it.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- coldtea 9y ago>those against "chemicals" in food often demonstrably have no idea what they're talking about No, but they clearly have an idea that they don't mean water or salt.
- _jal 9y agoI ignore anyone who makes pedantic word-choice arguments when everyone is clearly capable of understanding what's going on. At best, it is more obsessed with their own cleverness than actual discourse, but more usually is just dishonest.