4 ms·
>Also, your statement about H1s getting paid way less isn't usually true, they're required to be paid the prevailing wage for the job they're doing in their geo
by learc83 9y ago
>Also, your statement about H1s getting paid way less isn't usually true, they're required to be paid the prevailing wage for the job they're doing in their geographical area.
That's easy to game and not enforced very well.
>there's some good reasons
Often that good reason is that if they're fired and can't very quickly find another employer, they'll have to leave the country. And if the company is sponsoring a green card, depending on where they are in the process if they change employers, they'll be moved back in priority.
Employing a workforce full of H-1B visa holders means you have a workforce with drastically reduced mobility. That alone is worth the price for many employers. Add to that the fact that it's relatively easy to get away with something like hiring someone for QA and making them do development work (to bypass prevailing wage requirements) and H-1Bs are a lot more attractive than you seem to think.
- calvinbhai 9y agoI agree on many of the points you made. This is the reason h1b needs to be abolished and replaced with a high skilled immigration system like Canada's. it'll give true mobility for the immigrant and less power to the company to abuse, which would in turn lead to less or no wage disparity among immigrants and citizens of US.