3 ms·
Very nice, but if you lose the function keyword and just use name () {... ; } you'll have greater cross-shell compatibility and they'll be a little shorter.
by aaronchall 9y ago
Very nice, but if you lose the function keyword and just use
name () {... ; }
you'll have greater cross-shell compatibility and they'll be a little shorter.
- skanga 9y agoThanks. Good idea.
- aaronchall 9y agoI see you made the changes in a new post below. Very cool, but maybe a gist or repo on github would be better?