4 ms·
I'm sorry about that, I was not trying to editorialize the headline at all, I changed the first part to "YC" because the original headline was too long: "This
by sandmansandine 9y ago
I'm sorry about that, I was not trying to editorialize the headline at all, I changed the first part to "YC" because the original headline was too long:
"This influential Silicon Valley firm is compiling a blacklist of venture capitalists accused of harassing women"
It appears the WaPo changed the headline:
"This influential Silicon Valley firm is spearheading a blacklist of venture capitalists accused of harassing women"
NewsDiff still has the original:
http://newsdiffs.org/article-history/https%3A/www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/this-influential-silicon-valley-firm-is-compiling-a-blacklist-of-venture-capitalists-who-harass-women/2017/07/14/1dfc7164-6661-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html http://newsdiffs.org/article-history/https%3A/www.washington...
It would definitely be good for the mods to change the title to reflect the new WaPo headline.
- adrianratnapala 9y agoI don't mind the summary since it, and both versions of the WP headline you mention match the pattern "X is compiling a blackist of Y accused of Z". My concern with the headline is not about how they are written, it is about what real aspects of society they reflect. If those reflections are accurate, then the headlines are not a problem at all. And if the headlines don't relfect realtiy, that's WP's problem, not yours.
- sandmansandine 9y agoYeah I noticed they changed the headline and read your comment too quickly.