4 ms·
This just isn't true. The host already approved of the extra guests and the extra dogs and only reneged when the tenant was enroute. You're bending over backwar
by rhcom2 9y ago
This just isn't true. The host already approved of the extra guests and the extra dogs and only reneged when the tenant was enroute. You're bending over backwards to apologize for this racist host.
> "When Suh later asked if it was OK to bring two friends and two dogs along, Barker said it was fine but the group would need to pay an additional $50 a night, according to screenshots of their text messages."
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/13/airbnb-california-racist-comment-penalty-asian-american https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/13/airbnb-ca...
- usaphp 9y ago> The host already approved of the extra guests and the extra dogs and only reneged when the tenant was enroute. Looking at a chat history they show in the video (around 55 sec) it does not look like the host has approved extra guests and dogs https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=55&v=nuZn8iVQbSc https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=55&v=nuZn8iVQbSc
- msie 9y agoShe didn't object to the proposal before the trip, in another chat conversation (weeks before?).
- hitekker 9y agoAgreed. White supremacists pretend to disavow race but then latch onto any secondary characteristic to besmirch their racial targets. "Come!" says the newly created account "Ignore the vitriol of the victimizer and excoriate the unrelated, perhaps imaginary failings of the victim!"