3 ms·
Your argument is as speculative if not more. Resources are not all equal. The ex driver or ex cashier is not going to starve to death. But it's not getting the
by DiThi 9y ago
Your argument is as speculative if not more. Resources are not all equal. The ex driver or ex cashier is not going to starve to death. But it's not getting the same salary, if any at all.
- calafrax 9y agoMy argument is speculative except that technological progress has always led to increasing generalized prosperity in the past. The adjustment periods have been on the scale of generations though so you can definitely have localized decreases in well being for large segments of the population due to technological change.
- DiThi 9y ago> has always led to increasing generalized prosperity in the past Because people always had something else to do. But what will happen when machines can do pretty much everything? That never happened in history before.
- calafrax 9y agoThis is a kind of "end of history" argument that assumes no further advances can happen. I just don't buy it. We will invent new things to do. Or, god forbid, maybe just spend some time relaxing and enjoying life instead of working ourselves to death.
- DiThi 9y ago> that assumes no further advances can happen ...by humans. > We will invent new things to do. Or, god forbid, maybe just spend some time relaxing and enjoying life instead of working ourselves to death. With some luck we'll be good pets.