3 ms·
Disclaimer: this is a throwaway account, and I used to work for IBM. I like Cloudant .. it is not too bad. In a recent project (after I left IBM), I needed to
by throwawaybbq1 9y ago
Disclaimer: this is a throwaway account, and I used to work for IBM.
I like Cloudant .. it is not too bad. In a recent project (after I left IBM), I needed to get a data tier up quickly and I actually used it for the initial POC. And yes, it was an acquisition by IBM. I was a bit worried that bluewashing would have made Cloudant crap but looks like they have managed to avoid it. The caveat I'd suggest is look closely at the pricing model. If you want QoS and scale, be careful of the pricing model. For small projects and projects that need fast completion (what project today doesn't?), it is actually very nice. You asked for caveats .. I think some of the language bindings were a bit out of date .. but since it uses REST calls, it wasn't too hard to bypass.