3 ms·
First Qt would need to be written in C so it's usable from other languages. The list of broken Qt bindings is much longer than the list of working ones. That or
by flukus 9y ago
First Qt would need to be written in C so it's usable from other languages. The list of broken Qt bindings is much longer than the list of working ones. That or the language bindings need to be part of Qt itself so they can be maintained instead of abandoned.
Qml is an awful xml+javascript layer on top of qt that adds nothing but unnecessary complication to building UI's. Using Qt directly is much simpler.
> QtCreator is usable
Funny, last time I tried it was literally unusable. The new project dialog expanded beyond the height of the screen and all I could do was kill the process.