>Compared to them Go is a very well thought out and elegant language. But interestingly, not one I would choose with which to embark on a project that I expect

>Compared to them Go is a very well thought out and elegant language. But interestingly, not one I would choose with which to embark on a project that I expected to require more than 2000 lines of code (as a ballpark scale measurement). Go seems to be an excellent glue language. It's very suitable for making a tool that does /this/ and only /this/, putting it in a docker container and running 500 of it at once, linking other parts of my stack together. I would never use it to write a RDMS, because (as someone who has admittedly been following the situation only loosely) the language maintainers don't seem interested in solving other-people problems. They seem to be making a language for them, and I can respect and understand that, but it certainly gives me pause to think about using it for anything big. If I run into a problem that Go can't solve, will it be possible to persuade the language developers to give a shit? Situation unclear.