2 ms·

>It shifts the risk from the students to the school, which is IMO how it should be. I love this idea, thank you for starting this! I think this something ther

>It shifts the risk from the students to the school, which is IMO how it should be. I love this idea, thank you for starting this! I think this something there should be more of. I just looked at your site, and noticed the 3% acceptance rate for the $0 upfront cost tier. Just curious how that's changed over time as your exposure has increased. I assume you are trying to maintain some instructor/student ratio, etc? Are you willing to share what limits you from accepting more students at the $0 upfront tier? If so I'd love hear more, lmk.

austenallred 9y ago
We've grown almost in line with the increase in applications in number of instructors. We haven't raised real money or anything, so we're limited by the number of instructors and cash we can pay them, but we're growing as quickly as we can without sacrificing quality. We see hundreds of new applications per day and can only service a small fraction of them. Hopefully we can change that to some degree soon.