4 ms·
I'm disappointed by the fact that this error comes with a response code 200. I was expecting either 69 or 666 or something of the kind! If your gonna be wonky,
by amarant 9y ago
I'm disappointed by the fact that this error comes with a response code 200. I was expecting either 69 or 666 or something of the kind! If your gonna be wonky, why not go all out? ;)
- throwaway2016a 9y agoI believe 406 Not Acceptable would be the proper response. While typically I would discourage using that response code unless the error is with the Accepts header. I would make an exception in this case Edit: Whoever downvoted me needs to get a life. I'm playing along with the joke not trying to correct amarant.
- supercoder 9y agoWho made you the boss of http codes
- throwaway2016a 9y agoChill dude. I was playing along with the joke. Also, a boss would say "You must use this code!" not politely discourage it... also W3C