3 ms·

Also: that second post is shitty and deserved a warning. It has 0 content, 0 value, and is 99% designed to flamebait.

• Danihan 9y ago
  I'd completely disagree, I thought it was an interesting perspective from someone outside of the US. It's telling to me that you believe you can tell someone's intentions (99% designed to flamebait.) And that you seem to think just because a comment doesn't have value to you personally, it's worthless (0 value).
  • KirinDave 9y ago
    I do not care about reading the tea leaves of someone's intentions. Their english was crisp and well-delivered, it was quite clear there was no miscommunication. People who participate in bad faith deserve to be warned, rate limited, then banned. Those are the rules of this community and while I don't always agree with the interpretations therein, I think it's important we recognize them and respect the boundaries that are drawn while within this infrastructure. We can attempt to undermine it externally if we feel the need.