3 ms·
> Rovers are great for low budget exploration, but if you want to kick things into high gear, there's no substitution for trained humans. But how many rovers
by jldugger 9y ago
> Rovers are great for low budget exploration, but if you want to kick things into high gear, there's no substitution for trained humans.
But how many rovers can you get for the price of one round trip space party?
- codys 9y agoIt's fairly hard to figure this out. What follows is a really bad comparison between Apollo & Curiosity, which completely ignores tech advancement, the difference between a moon flight and a mars flight, the length of time for each mission, the amount of data collected, and a whole lot of other stuff. The cost of Apollo program in 1973 was reported as ~$25 billion. In 2016 dollars, ~$135 billion. The Apollo program made 6 manned landings (I'm going to ignore non-landing missions as we're talking about rovers & consider them part of the development cost for the program). The curiosity mission was reported as costing $2.5 billion in 2011 ($2.6 billion in 2016 dollars). So with some really bad math (as noted earlier): - dollars per manned moon mission = 135/6 = 22.5 billion - dollars per unmanned mars mission = 2.6 billion - For the cost of 1 manned moon mission, we could have ~8 (22.5/2.6) unmanned mars missions.