2 ms·
Uh I'm obviously referring to BIP148 when I say UASF, but way to argue with semantics. > BitMain is very adamant about not wanting low fees. Yet Bitmain suppo
by lawn 9y ago
Uh I'm obviously referring to BIP148 when I say UASF, but way to argue with semantics.
> BitMain is very adamant about not wanting low fees.
Yet Bitmain supports larger blocks, you're not making sense.
> Your personal attacks and failure to address the technical issues speak for themselves, so I have not quoted them, nor responded.
What personal attacks? Sure, continue dismiss it as "FUD" or "non-technical people".
- rothbardrand 9y agoIt's not semantics when you're talking about different activation mechanisms... that you think it is proves to me you don't really understand what's going on. I point out a contradiction in Bitmains position and you say that means I'm not making sense? Once again, you are arguing that your ignorance somehow trumps the facts. And of course, you resorting to insults is all the proof I could have needed. Go educate yourself. Start at bitcoin.org