6 ms·
In case the rows play a role, I have it (OCR'd and manually corrected) as : bThvW3JKYz16bXpUWDIufkl2OllseC4maV1gMjtVYXNtb2RyZ3czbkQzQDtn ZnRdMVZuZkIqVTJpIGlxa2
by stereo 16y ago
In case the rows play a role, I have it (OCR'd and manually corrected) as :
bThvW3JKYz16bXpUWDIufkl2OllseC4maV1gMjtVYXNtb2RyZ3czbkQzQDtn
ZnRdMVZuZkIqVTJpIGlxa2xubkAoaTRueGdQaGN0YyRjTGN1WGlUbzF5VU5q
cz50KmRwZXlncGN0dA==
The == at the end make it look suspiciously like some kind of base64, but no luck.
Edit: updated for s/0/O/
Edit 2: it isn't a simple rotation of a base64 string either. Maybe the == is a red herring.
- logic 16y agobase64 decoding of the text results in: m8o[rJc=zmzTX2.~Iv:Ylx.&i]`2;Uasmodrgw3nD3@;gft]1VnfB*U2i iqklnn@(i4nxgPhctc$cLcuXiTo1yUNjs>t*dpeygpctt That's all printable ASCII, which I don't suspect is a coincidence.
- stereo 16y agoHah, of course! Well, ROTing that doesn't yield anything either, and it's too small to analyse character frequency if it's a cipher. I tried using 'thinkcode' as a substitution key, and the end looks a bit like 'thinkcode' itself!
- KirinDave 16y agoHave you considered that it is probably valid perl? ;)
- swolchok 16y agoOne of my friends thought it looked like base85, but it is not.
- jcrocholl 16y agobase64: bThvW3JKYz16bXpUWDIufkl2OllseC4maV1gMjtVYXNtb2RyZ3czbkQzQDtnZnRdMVZuZkIqVTJpIGlxa2xubkAoaTRueGdQaGN0YyRjTGN1WGlUbzF5VU5qcz50KmRwZXlncGN0dA== text: m8o[rJc=zmzTX2.~Iv:Ylx.&i]`2;Uasmodrgw3nD3@;gft]1VnfB*U2i iqklnn@(i4nxgPhctc$cLcuXiTo1yUNjs>t*dpeygpctt letters: $&(48:=>BDIJLNPVY[`aehjkquvw~*.13;@TX]dflprsxyz2Umogintc counted: 111111111111111111111111111111222222222222222222333345556 progressively hiding infrequent letters: m o r c zmzTX2. lx. i] 2;U smodrg 3n 3@;gft]1 nf *U2i i lnn@ i nxg ctc c c XiTo1yU s t*dp ygpctt m o c m 2 i 2 U mo g n g t n U2i i nn i n g ctc c c i o U t g ctt c i g n g t n i i nn i n g ctc c c i t g ctt c i n t n i i nn i n ctc c c i t ctt c c c c c c Python script: http://pastebin.com/7Jv891zg http://pastebin.com/7Jv891zg