> Thanks for the first link, it's a pretty good summary of the arguments for. My question would be why don't most of those fall under fraud statutes. Because t

> Thanks for the first link, it's a pretty good summary of the arguments for. My question would be why don't most of those fall under fraud statutes. Because they're not fraud unless we make laws regulating such behavior. And, lawmaking can begin with setting proper FCC policy. > And calling me "willfully ignorant" is a good example of why net neutrality has failed to get wider support. I'm a full-time developer, I do read a lot about a lot of issues, but I'm also busy with a full life. Dude, if you're a developer, I'm not going to let you off the hook so easily. You should be familiar with the arguments, both for and against. Whether you agree with one side or the other is up to you-but you should at least be aware of the issues. I'm sure you've told someone to Google answers to a simple question before. This is no different. I got those links by Googling your question. Generally speaking, the concise arguments are to spread awareness among non-tech folks. They are a dumbed down version of the details. The old CP Grey video is good [1], as are recent graphics showing what could realistically happen [2]. [1] https://youtu.be/wtt2aSV8wdw https://youtu.be/wtt2aSV8wdw [2] https://i.redd.it/ehh1nypob79z.jpg https://i.redd.it/ehh1nypob79z.jpg