> I don't think it's right to enshrine into law that Comcast can't offer her a plan where she pays $5/mo instead for limited access Fair enough... > to the fe

> I don't think it's right to enshrine into law that Comcast can't offer her a plan where she pays $5/mo instead for limited access Fair enough... > to the few sites she uses. My understanding is that it's this second bit that has people up in arms. Why does it matter what sites she uses? It's completely legal for an ISP to offer a hard-data-capped, low-cost plan even now.