> I think your response is using my misunderstanding of your position to score points & promote your agenda, instead of clarifying what you said so I understand

> I think your response is using my misunderstanding of your position to score points & promote your agenda, instead of clarifying what you said so I understand it better. If you find my restating of my position—attempting to clarify it and put it in context—is "scoring points" then I only see 2 things: 1. Upon understanding it better you find my arguments more tailored to the argument and think this represents an unfair action. 2. You would rather I just agree with you rather than write honest responses. The idea that I have any standing TO disagree is evidence of "an agenda," an inappropriate thing to bring at all. Not sure how a constructive conversation can continue, based on this. I reject your premise. You reject mine. This conversation is only growing thornier and more tedious, and it's only out of respect to you that I have continued in good faith thus far. Perhaps this is where we agree to disagree and move on?