4 ms·

This is exactly what I thought. Went to reddit.com...where's the Net Neutrality protest? Oh I just realized they made their logo a gif that looks like it loads

This is exactly what I thought. Went to reddit.com...where's the Net Neutrality protest? Oh I just realized they made their logo a gif that looks like it loads slow...and they made a post... Went to google.com...the doodle is unrelated and I saw nothing about net neutrality on the site... Went to mozilla.org and I see absolutely nothing about it. I feel like I must be missing something here. Hackernews...looks the same but slightly grayed. Oh the black bar is a link, didn't realize that. But no messages or anything obvious. LinkedIn.com maybe? Nothing Twitter? They have a hashtag that's trending...that's it. Facebook? I see nothing. Not even a trending topic. This is a very luke warm day of technology companies protesting net neutrality. I expected at least a tiny blurb on a homepage SOMEWHERE. So far Netflix and DuckDuckGo are the only large sites that I've notice actually put something on their homepage.

chiefofgxbxl 9y ago
Agreed, this is a very poor showing of support from major websites. I remember Wikipedia doing a "black out" day, along with several other websites years back. If you visited the web page, all you saw was a black page and a quick explanation that the web could be censored if legislation were to pass. I've visited several participants' sites to see nothing. GitHub didn't have a single thing, Wikipedia: nothing, and Google (or Alphabet) isn't even listed on the list of participants [0]. [0] https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/#participants https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/#participants
- marksomnian 9y ago
  The Wikipedia community seems to have a strong dislike [0][1][2] for anything like the SOPA blackout, partially as it's not as black-and-white as SOPA, and partially because Wikipedia directly wouldn't be affected (their site is pretty fast). Worth noting that Wikipedia Zero [3] exists, and has been taking flak for not being the most NN-friendly initiative. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_162#Net_neutrality_maybe_in_great_danger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_140#Is_anything_happening_with_Wikipedia_in_relation_to_the_July_12_Net_Neutrality_day_of_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(propos... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_139#Wikipedia_and_Net_Neutrality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(propos... [3] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/11/25/wikipedias-complicated-relationship-with-net-neutrality/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/11/25...
spookyuser 9y ago
I think archive.org has the best Net Neutrality protest. Very _in your face_ and clear
mrkrabo 9y ago
Why do you want to ruin the internet more for the rest of the world today?
- LeifCarrotson 9y ago
  Because I want to protect it for the whole world for the future. Netflix, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, Reddit, and other major services you use which are supporting net neutrality all started as American companies. If this measure fails, it's less likely that equally good companies will come from the resulting situation. Sorry about your Internet today, but they're doing it for your Internet tomorrow.
  - fuckthissite 9y ago
    go fuck yourself and circle jerk in th corner
  - wooter 9y ago
    weird considering they all came about from that "situation"
  - touristtam 9y ago
    We all know US market != Rest of the world market. What you have at home as a US Citizen isn't what the rest of the world gets. I agree that you should have a strong action at home. But spreading this to other countries and calling it collateral damage just shows how little consideration you have for the rest of the world.
adjkant 9y ago
Pornhub is doing more for this than many companies listed here if you check their homepage (still very minimal), which says a lot to me...
fuckthissite 9y ago
what do you expect. you guys circle jerk each other without paying attention to what people want. if you wanted net nuetrality, be nicer to people you fucking self righteous cunts
vacri 9y ago
Reddit didn't even change their banner announcement - it's currently promoting signing up for Reddit Gifts. The slow-loading logo only has a clue to what it's about in the alt-text; the link hasn't changed.
noobermin 9y ago
Actually, twitter trending a hashtag on it is pretty good given that is their core product. The rest, yes I agree.
- BinaryIdiot 9y ago
  Sure it's a core part but the trending hashtags are not easily visible unless you're on a desktop site and they just blend into the background. They don't seem very prominent at all and I certainly missed them at first when I was looking around for Net Neutrality references. I would be curious if users even look at those on mobile since it requires more effort to see.
princeb 9y ago
facebook and wikipedia cannot protest net neutrality; they are working to get (a version of) their websites zero-rated.

chiefofgxbxl 9y ago

Agreed, this is a very poor showing of support from major websites. I remember Wikipedia doing a "black out" day, along with several other websites years back. If you visited the web page, all you saw was a black page and a quick explanation that the web could be censored if legislation were to pass. I've visited several participants' sites to see nothing. GitHub didn't have a single thing, Wikipedia: nothing, and Google (or Alphabet) isn't even listed on the list of participants [0]. [0] https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/#participants https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/#participants

marksomnian 9y ago
The Wikipedia community seems to have a strong dislike [0][1][2] for anything like the SOPA blackout, partially as it's not as black-and-white as SOPA, and partially because Wikipedia directly wouldn't be affected (their site is pretty fast). Worth noting that Wikipedia Zero [3] exists, and has been taking flak for not being the most NN-friendly initiative. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_162#Net_neutrality_maybe_in_great_danger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_140#Is_anything_happening_with_Wikipedia_in_relation_to_the_July_12_Net_Neutrality_day_of_action https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(propos... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_139#Wikipedia_and_Net_Neutrality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(propos... [3] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/11/25/wikipedias-complicated-relationship-with-net-neutrality/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/11/25...

spookyuser 9y ago

I think archive.org has the best Net Neutrality protest. Very _in your face_ and clear

mrkrabo 9y ago

Why do you want to ruin the internet more for the rest of the world today?

LeifCarrotson 9y ago
Because I want to protect it for the whole world for the future. Netflix, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Wikipedia, Twitter, Reddit, and other major services you use which are supporting net neutrality all started as American companies. If this measure fails, it's less likely that equally good companies will come from the resulting situation. Sorry about your Internet today, but they're doing it for your Internet tomorrow.
- fuckthissite 9y ago
  go fuck yourself and circle jerk in th corner
- wooter 9y ago
  weird considering they all came about from that "situation"
- touristtam 9y ago
  We all know US market != Rest of the world market. What you have at home as a US Citizen isn't what the rest of the world gets. I agree that you should have a strong action at home. But spreading this to other countries and calling it collateral damage just shows how little consideration you have for the rest of the world.

adjkant 9y ago

Pornhub is doing more for this than many companies listed here if you check their homepage (still very minimal), which says a lot to me...

fuckthissite 9y ago

what do you expect. you guys circle jerk each other without paying attention to what people want. if you wanted net nuetrality, be nicer to people you fucking self righteous cunts

vacri 9y ago

Reddit didn't even change their banner announcement - it's currently promoting signing up for Reddit Gifts. The slow-loading logo only has a clue to what it's about in the alt-text; the link hasn't changed.

noobermin 9y ago

Actually, twitter trending a hashtag on it is pretty good given that is their core product. The rest, yes I agree.

BinaryIdiot 9y ago
Sure it's a core part but the trending hashtags are not easily visible unless you're on a desktop site and they just blend into the background. They don't seem very prominent at all and I certainly missed them at first when I was looking around for Net Neutrality references. I would be curious if users even look at those on mobile since it requires more effort to see.

princeb 9y ago

facebook and wikipedia cannot protest net neutrality; they are working to get (a version of) their websites zero-rated.