4 ms·
It's not "obvious" that it violates either of those. The general consensus is that normal GA tracking alone does not meet the standards to trigger either the E
by eli 9y ago
It's not "obvious" that it violates either of those.
The general consensus is that normal GA tracking alone does not meet the standards to trigger either the EU or the stricter Dutch cookie notification requirements since they are using first-party cookies not tied to PII and don't follow you across sites. And that's assuming a standard GA snippet, not the smaller subset of data Mozilla is collecting here.
And the GA ToS require you to have a privacy policy and to make users aware of it. It doesn't require a link on every page. You already agreed to the Mozilla privacy policy as part of the Firefox install process, right?
- gcp 9y agoThe general consensus is that normal GA tracking alone does not meet the standards to trigger either the EU or the stricter Dutch cookie notification requirements since they are using first-party cookies not tied to PII and don't follow you across sites Do you have a good reference for this? Especially the "don't follow you across sites" seems weird as Google will end up collecting hits from the same IP/browser/etc combo across sites, which trivially allows following.
- amichal 9y agoI don't know what firefox addon pages does (and i see they have a special arrangement) and am not taking sides but for IP at least there is an option partially scrub it before it gets to disk at Google. https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2763052?hl=en https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2763052?hl=en Edit: what do we think?
- amichal 9y agoFound a source for this opinion. Here [1] are instructions from the Dutch Government's "Personal Data Authority" on setting up GA in compliance with their laws in a way that does (did?) not require an explicit notice. See [2] for an explanation in english [1] https://autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/sites/default/files/atoms/files/handleiding_privacyvriendelijk_instellen_google_analytics_1.pdf https://autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/sites/default/files/at... [2] https://www.iabeurope.eu/eucookielaws/nl/ https://www.iabeurope.eu/eucookielaws/nl/ TLDR: If you use the following code. You are fine to use GA without a notice under Dutch law. ga('set', 'forceSSL', true); ga('set', 'anonymizeIp', true);
- lucideer 9y ago> The general consensus is that normal GA tracking alone does not meet the standards to trigger either the EU or the stricter Dutch cookie notification requirements since they are using first-party cookies not tied to PII and don't follow you across sites I don't know about following you across sites, but "PII" is a US legal term, so I highly doubt it's a determiner in applying EU law. GA may not collect PII under US law, but it does fall into EU data protection compliance. The problem in the EU is the system of enforcement. EU directives require member states to legislate individually, and to enforce their own legislation individually. If that enforcement is deficient, the case can be taken to the ECJ on an individual basis (at possibly significant cost). This doesn't work. Which has motivated the creation of GDPR[0], but unfortunately this doesn't come into play until 2018 [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDPR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDPR