6 ms·
It's only a false equivalence because you just moved your goalposts from "no tracking/analytics" in the original post to consent. If Mozilla devs adhered to th
by gcp 9y ago
It's only a false equivalence because you just moved your goalposts from "no tracking/analytics" in the original post to consent.
If Mozilla devs adhered to the ethos of the company they took a job at they simply would not have implemented this feature.
It looks as when the problem was reported, this was in fact the reaction: make it respect DNT. Using GA by itself rose no red flags because Mozilla has a privacy-enforcing deal with Google about it.
- lucideer 9y agoI'm not sure what you mean by moving goalposts? I was mainly just discussing my own expectations, but also, it looks like the above comment from davb that you replied to did discuss consent. > Using GA by itself rose no red flags because Mozilla has a privacy-enforcing deal with Google about it. I saw that, and I guess that legal contract may appease some people. Personally, I would rather not have to trust a company with a well-earned reputation for breaking the law when it comes to respecting users' privacy. I would rather they spent the time they invested into negotiating that contract on self-hosting instead.