4 ms·
The NoFail programming language
- vbrandl 9y agoI'm not quite sure if this is a joke or not. Providing a flexible syntax for structuring the code _might_ be a nice thing. But stuff like silently ignoring typos in variable names or evaluating terms by interpreting the amount of spaces instead of mathematical rules seems to be a really, _really_ bad idea. Also using error codes instead of exceptions or something like the `Result` type in Rust also seems to be a bad idea. The language should force the programmer to handle errors in a correct way instead of making it optional.
- janesconference 9y agoNo implementation = joke.