I know that, but, if you take the approach that having a prevalence of one group in some positions is a wrong, then you have to ask: is a wrong from 130 years a

I know that, but, if you take the approach that having a prevalence of one group in some positions is a wrong, then you have to ask: is a wrong from 130 years ago a valid justification for a wrong today? That's why it's a slippery slope.