Seems like a strawman to me. This article is about a man who misinterprets a car purchase and pulls a gun to "protect" property, which was not his and was not

Seems like a strawman to me. This article is about a man who misinterprets a car purchase and pulls a gun to "protect" property, which was not his and was not being stolen. If someone pulls a gun to "defend their property", they better be really damned sure it is their property and the property was being stolen (not a {leinholder, repoman, undercover police officer, deaf person, autistic person, etc}). The risk of making the wrong decision may not be high, but the impact of the wrong decision is.