> That is completely different because religion is not based on testable and provable increments increases in knowledge, rather superstition and guesswork. You

> That is completely different because religion is not based on testable and provable increments increases in knowledge, rather superstition and guesswork. You clearly do not understand the scientific method. This is prejudice against others faith, religion AND science. Alchemy was the science back then and the base of current chemistry but is religious work, that also increases people's knowledge. I could explain the same with Buddhism and how its knowledge could save billions of lives, but I'm not a religious guy (much less fundamentalist). Just skeptical.