3 ms·
A dichotomy: - executive power should be wielded (WITH | WITHOUT) input from leaders of the economy I'm not arguing that we should elect Trump. It's done. Now
by ethanhunt_ 9y ago
A dichotomy:
- executive power should be wielded (WITH | WITHOUT) input from leaders of the economy
I'm not arguing that we should elect Trump. It's done. Now that he wields exec power, you think that "WITHOUT" is the better choice above? Why?
- dragonwriter 9y ago> A syllogism: > - executive power should be wielded (WITH | WITHOUT) input from leaders of the economy That's not anything remotely like a syllogism; it's just a dichotomy. A syllogism is a structured argument consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that follows from the two premises.
- tptacek 9y agoAs I've written elsewhere here, I think we're generally better off with a government that does not arrange endorsements from corporate figureheads.
- pcwalton 9y agoThat's an irrelevant question, because Trump has demonstrated no interest in input from leaders of the economy. A more relevant question is whether it's worth it for leaders of the industry to publicly pretend to give input to a person who they know will ignore it.