4 ms·
It was adopted because the maintainers of distributions like Debian examined the alternatives and decided that systemd was technically superior. For example, pl
by jcrites 9y ago
It was adopted because the maintainers of distributions like Debian examined the alternatives and decided that systemd was technically superior. For example, please see the analysis of systemd and upstart by Debian maintainer and then-Technical Committee member Russ Allbery: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2013/12/msg00234.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2013/12/msg00234.html
- JdeBP 9y ago> distributions like Debian In fact, only Debian underwent that process. Ubuntu did not. Nor did Fedora. The Arch process was very different. * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11834348 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11834348
- digi_owl 9y agoWell in a sense Ubuntu did by proxy. A big proponent of systemd within Debian works for Canonical, and Canonical had already stated that if Debian switched they would switch. After all, Ubuntu is basically for Debain what RHEL is for Fedora.