2 ms·
.Net Framework, .Net Core and .Net Standard all have different version numbers, which correspond to different things. In addition, since Core and Standard are b
by ltowel 9y ago
.Net Framework, .Net Core and .Net Standard all have different version numbers, which correspond to different things. In addition, since Core and Standard are both in the 1.Xs currently, it can be confusing. Finally, the .Net Core SDK is versioned differently from the run time, both somewhere in the low 1.Xs right now.
```
>dotnet
Microsoft .NET Core Shared Framework Host
Version : 1.1.0
Build : 928f77c4bc3f49d892459992fb6e1d5542cb5e86
```
```
>dotnet --version
1.0.0-preview2-1-003177
```
The version numbers aren't necessarily weird, but the versioning sure is.
Disclaimer: MS Employee who uses Dotnet, but doesn't work on it.
- skeletonjelly 9y agoMight be worth posting this https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standard https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standar... I should probably print it out I was in version hell yesterday, targeting a standard (1.5) because I thought it would help me run as .NET Core 1 whilst supporting a 4.6.2 .NET Framework dll but that broke something else. It was a juggling game of trade offs
- int_19h 9y agoAh, I keep forgetting about the Standard. This makes sense (as in, it does make less sense now that it makes sense).