CO2 is invisible. Pictures makes articles more appealing, easier to understand and profitable. It's not like they are even lying, you agree there is some smok

CO2 is invisible. Pictures makes articles more appealing, easier to understand and profitable. It's not like they are even lying, you agree there is some smoke an pollutants in there. What should they take a picture of? Can't smokestacks, a long time symbol of industry, be just that a symbol? It's not like they are lying about the numbers in the article or even make claims about the picture.