3 ms·
Math skills (esp proofs) shape the way you approach problems, giving the problem structure and providing you the tools to reduce it into components, relations,
by randcraw 9y ago
Math skills (esp proofs) shape the way you approach problems, giving the problem structure and providing you the tools to reduce it into components, relations, and dependencies. To make mysteries unmysterious, such tools are indispensable.
I'd go so far to disagree with you that people do well without learning math skill (those tools of thinking). If you can deconstruct a problem, then you certainly learned that skill somewhere, just not in a math class.
Abstraction and reductionism are unusual capabilities to acquire on your own. As I recall, they're almost nonexistent in pre-linguistic societies like hunter-gatherers. If you have no words for abstract concepts, your thinking will be strictly concrete.
- FLUX-YOU 9y agoI feel like there's at least three ways of thinking about problems that are practical: - systematic (math, rule-based) - social (history, emotions, people-based) - creative (art, invention) These all overlap and feed into each other because we're a complex species, but we really only ever hear about the necessity of math to "learn to think".
- erezsh 9y agoMath is a subset of logical thinking. There are deconstructions of thought that math cannot handle, for example in domains where the axioms are too complex, or perhaps even unknown.