4 ms·
My problem with Math education was always that speed was an enormous factor in testing. You can methodically go through each question aiming for 100% accuracy a
by J_Sherz 9y ago
My problem with Math education was always that speed was an enormous factor in testing. You can methodically go through each question aiming for 100% accuracy and not finish the test paper, while other students can comfortably breeze through all the questions and get 80% accuracy but ultimately score higher on the test. This kind of penalizing for a lack of speed can lead to younger kids who are maximizing for grades to move away from Math for the wrong reasons.
Source: I'm slow but good at Math and ended up dropping it as soon as I could because it would not get me the grades I needed to enter a top tier university.
- MengerSponge 9y agoYou couldn't finish your tests in high school, but you're good at math? Have you ever been evaluated for test anxiety? https://www.adaa.org/living-with-anxiety/children/test-anxiety https://www.adaa.org/living-with-anxiety/children/test-anxie... There's no shame in it (although high schoolers can be assholes), and it can help your school accommodate your needs eg extra time to take your exams.
- J_Sherz 9y agoI've never been evaluated but I don't think test anxiety fits in my case - the speed issue was only ever in math / physics. My accuracy on the questions I got to was very high, I just couldn't go fast enough to complete enough questions. Same deal on SAT type math papers too.
- alimw 9y agoWhere I did my undergraduate degree they squared the marks scored for each question before adding them up! Slow but accurate was an advantage.
- xfer 9y agoBut, most exams at that level gives enough time to make them accurate.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- MengerSponge 9y agoDifferent tests challenge people differently. It may be that you only needed an accommodation in computationally heavy exams.* Truthfully, my mention of accommodations isn't for you--I'm assuming you're out of high school already and you've found a professional niche that works for you. I mention test anxiety and the professional workarounds for high schoolers or their parents. *) This is actually moving well beyond my expertise. I know about the existence of test anxiety, and I've accommodated students with it. A brief consult with Dr. Google surfaced some clinically recommended accommodations that probably would have helped you. Sorry I don't have a time machine! http://www.2enewsletter.com/article_2013_05_slow_processing.html http://www.2enewsletter.com/article_2013_05_slow_processing.... This one's my favorite: "Reducing the number of tasks required to demonstrate competence (such as 5 math problems instead of 25)"
- analog31 9y agoIn my view, speed plays a role, though I can't say that it should play such a central role. I think that in a lot of disciplines, you have to become fluent at manipulations, and at seeing and thinking in higher level patterns. Being able to think your way through a more complex problem would seem to benefit from, if not require, seeing multiple steps ahead in a progression. At least this is my perception. My experience in school math was that it wasn't enough to satisfy myself that I knew how to solve a problem. I then had to work my way through a whole bunch of similar problems until I could perform the manipulations quickly. This is also how I managed to commit the definitions, axioms, and theorems to memory. If I didn't do that stuff, then I got my arse handed to me on the exam. I gave my kids pretty much the same advice.