>it can be combatted by public denigration of companies that consider men to be preferable hires on the basis of lower risk of disruption and lower costs. Was

>it can be combatted by public denigration of companies that consider men to be preferable hires on the basis of lower risk of disruption and lower costs. Was this said in sarcasm? I feel like it was, but I'm not a good judge of when sarcasm is used.