4 ms·
>Surely the pilot would notice at least one of the planes he'd be inevitably crashing into well before he started to land In theory yes, but the risk is that t
by ddeck 9y ago
>Surely the pilot would notice at least one of the planes he'd be inevitably crashing into well before he started to land
In theory yes, but the risk is that the plane you crash into is not yet on the taxiway or that poor visibility or tunneled focus prevents you from noticing it.
You don't need to be moving quickly to have a significant accident. The deadliest aviation accident in history (583 fatalities) resulted when two planes collided on a taxiway (edit: actually on the runway) in dense fog [1].
Edit: as correctly pointed out below, the actual collision took place on the runway at significant speed.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster
- Pinckney 9y agoYou're mistaken. The KLM plane took off when it was not cleared, and they collided at 260km/h.
- cyberferret 9y agoThat was just one of seven distinct mistakes that lead to the crash. The PanAm pilot missed his turnoff, the controllers were busy watching a football match and missed the radio cues that could have alerted them to the fact there was an impending problem etc. etc.
- kgwgk 9y agoIt's interesting that it happened 40 years ago. Risks might be decreasing if we didn't see a larger one yet.