4 ms·
I think the poster was questioning why they weren't running a more recent version of Exchange such as 2013/2016
by hrrsn 9y ago
I think the poster was questioning why they weren't running a more recent version of Exchange such as 2013/2016
- kchoudhu 9y agoMy company uses 2010 as well. It's regularly patched and supported for another two or three years. Why fix what's not broken? (Yes, I know Clinton used 2010. Her admin was a dumbass though).