4 ms·
Sorry what's new about this? Aren't all the pieces existing AWS services? They've just put it in a nice graphic with the architecture drawn out. Not saying I d
by isuckatcoding 9y ago
Sorry what's new about this? Aren't all the pieces existing AWS services? They've just put it in a nice graphic with the architecture drawn out.
Not saying I don't like the architecture (actually think it's quite useful for many scenarios). Not sold on using DynamoDB (I'd rather use a traditional SQL store).
- gamesbrainiac 9y agoI really agree with you on this one, my acquaintances that have actually used this, use it for running bulk jobs that are triggered by S3 changes.
- jupiter90000 9y agoI wanted lambda for a bulk data processing task that would have been a nice use of it, but the 5 minute max on a process wasn't going to work for my use case. Maybe someday I'll find a use for it
- isuckatcoding 9y agoIs the task not splittable? I had to use lambda at work to import files from s3 ranging anywhere from a few megs up to 10-20gb. Ended up using two lambdas (one for creating byte ranges and another for processing those ranges).