5 ms·

>You are taking their two-faced behavior as evidence against global warming... You cannot logically conclude that based on what I wrote.

• aoeusnth1 9y ago
  That's the clear implication from what you wrote - did you not write it to dismiss the likelihood of global warming being caused by humans, and severe?
  • rhapsodic 9y ago
    > That's the clear implication from what you wrote It is absolutely NOT the clear implication from what I wrote. But while we're on the subject, do you have any theories as to why the people who wring their hands about the dire emergency that AGW supposedly is, never seem to call out rich, left-wing celebrities or rich left-wing tech moguls for their planet-destroying lifestyles?
    • pyrale 9y ago
      I can easily answer that question: some do, but you don't listen to them. Some don't because they understood you don't care about them doing so. You're not interested in why they do or don't do it, in fact. You're merely interested in making a whataboutist point.
      • rhapsodic 9y ago
        >I can easily answer that question: some do, but you don't listen to them. Some don't because they understood you don't care about them doing so. You're not interested in why they do or don't do it, in fact. You're merely interested in making a whataboutist point. Are you omniscient? You seem to think you are.