4 ms·

I'm saying that if someone is working full-time for a company, and they still require welfare, then that company is at fault.

• troupe 9y ago
  The cut off for welfare is determined by the size of your family. So to achieve what you describe, a company that has two people of the same minimal capabilities should pay the one that has kids more than the one that doesn't. Also it is possible to live without welfare (even if you qualify) if your expenses are low, but require welfare if your expenses are high. So it would also follow that two employees of equal value to a company would be paid differently with the larger amount going to the one who is living in more expensive housing.