4 ms·
Was that meant to be parody? That's an honest question; I'm not sure whether you're serious or not.
by chad_oliver 9y ago
Was that meant to be parody? That's an honest question; I'm not sure whether you're serious or not.
- flukus 9y agoThe first one gives it away. It's a rephrasing of "we'll sell at a loss and make it up in volume".
- tuna-piano 9y agoI'm honestly not too sure myself. Like I mean they all seem like stupid reasons that are used to justify loss-making companies that have no chance at success. At the same time, for the right company, they are pretty logical reasons. That said, loss-making umbrella shop really seems like a better explanation than a "a growth focused tech company with massive economies of scale, recurring revenue, and huge potential in a wide variety of other markets."