3 ms·
Yes, it's theoretically possible. When it happens in Kubernetes, it's far more common that m+A+B failed because of a flaky test than because B was actually brok
by Scaevolus 9y ago
Yes, it's theoretically possible. When it happens in Kubernetes, it's far more common that m+A+B failed because of a flaky test than because B was actually broken, and C+D fixed it.
What we often see is m+A fails because of a flake, and m+A+B+C+D+E passes and merges as a batch. We have a lot of flaky tests. :(
- saghm 9y agoI remember my first experience with That's flaky tests! (or more accurately, Cargo's: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/3715 https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/3715