3 ms·
I think it's possible too. But also think it's a little implausible nobody realized what was going on: longevity is too important (if only for guarantee purpose
by emn13 9y ago
I think it's possible too. But also think it's a little implausible nobody realized what was going on: longevity is too important (if only for guarantee purposes) for producers to have completely forgotten about it - well, most of em anyhow. And given how commercially self-serving the outcome, and how actively firms strategize for all kinds of income flows, I can't really buy the idea that it's all a benign unfortunate accident. It's possible; sure - but it wouldn't be my first guess for most non-tiny firms anyhow.
- inetknght 9y agoIt doesn't take "nobody" to realize what was going on; it only takes the decision makers to either not realize it or to actively decide for profit against longevity. Imagine a situation: Investors say: give me investment returns! People in charge say: give me profits! People making decisions say: profits or quality! People conducting day-to-day operations say: worry about regulations first, then profits, then quality! People doing the work say: this quality is poor, but I need my job and don't want to rock the boat! Maybe it's just anecdotal evidence, but that's generally been my experience over the past 10 to 15 years of doing things
- emn13 9y agoYeah, I agree completely. I just think that kind of behavior deserves a certain small amount of opprobrium ;-).