5 ms·

Posterous should spend a day creating an easy export from their own service to prove they aren't afraid of competition. Then they would come out of these 2 week

by sh1mmer 16y ago

Posterous should spend a day creating an easy export from their own service to prove they aren't afraid of competition. Then they would come out of these 2 weeks not looking like jerks. The blog post to Tumblr users still rankles me.

ttrashh 16y ago
One of the comments from the techcrunch post: there is no hypocrisy here. We have an API that gives users 100% access to all their content on Posterous, including the original media that was uploaded, in it's full size. This API can be found here: http://posterous.com/api/reading http://posterous.com/api/reading There is nothing stopping people from writing Posterous exporters that go to other services. In fact, Wordpress released a Posterous importer a few months ago. We support data portability. It's the user's content, not ours. It's our privilege to host it for our users, and we are working hard to be the best service out there.
- sh1mmer 16y ago
  I think it's great you have an open API. That's awesome. But I think it's also not about what users theoretically could do (if they were able), it's about making it as easy to get data out as you are making it to get data in. If you did that you'd look awesome. Actively demonstrating that you aren't at all afraid of the competition could be as powerful as all the import functionality.
irahul 16y ago
As already pointed out, posterous does have an API for that. Why on earth should posterous work on creating an app to do the migration? They have exposed the API and their part is done. Frankly, the guys at posterous would have been big morons if they won't already have thought about it before starting their "migrating from dying platforms" campaign. It doesn't imply moral or ethics; it's simply business sense that when you are accusing others of something, you aren't guilty of the same charges.

5 ms·

Posterous should spend a day creating an easy export from their own service to prove they aren't afraid of competition. Then they would come out of these 2 week

by sh1mmer 16y ago

ttrashh 16y ago
One of the comments from the techcrunch post: there is no hypocrisy here. We have an API that gives users 100% access to all their content on Posterous, including the original media that was uploaded, in it's full size. This API can be found here: http://posterous.com/api/reading http://posterous.com/api/reading There is nothing stopping people from writing Posterous exporters that go to other services. In fact, Wordpress released a Posterous importer a few months ago. We support data portability. It's the user's content, not ours. It's our privilege to host it for our users, and we are working hard to be the best service out there.
- sh1mmer 16y ago
  I think it's great you have an open API. That's awesome. But I think it's also not about what users theoretically could do (if they were able), it's about making it as easy to get data out as you are making it to get data in. If you did that you'd look awesome. Actively demonstrating that you aren't at all afraid of the competition could be as powerful as all the import functionality.
irahul 16y ago
As already pointed out, posterous does have an API for that. Why on earth should posterous work on creating an app to do the migration? They have exposed the API and their part is done. Frankly, the guys at posterous would have been big morons if they won't already have thought about it before starting their "migrating from dying platforms" campaign. It doesn't imply moral or ethics; it's simply business sense that when you are accusing others of something, you aren't guilty of the same charges.