> But your original statement was much stronger ("impossible") No, my original statement was that waterproofing would be all but impossible, which, unless you

> But your original statement was much stronger ("impossible") No, my original statement was that waterproofing would be all but impossible, which, unless you have an example of a waterproof modular phone, still stands. > The Fairphone's specs are deliberately not top-of-the-line in order to give users better battery life. A handy excuse. Still means you’re getting a slower phone, worse screen, camera, etc. > That and repairability is worth much more to me than the possibility to submerge the phone in water. Tell that to the thousands of people who were previously losing their phone to water damage every year. And it’s not like an iPhone is not repairable, its just that you’ll need Apple to do it for you. A small price to pay for a better product.